We have all had this happen.
You land an amazing opportunity for a client. You crafted an incredible pitch. You got the yes from the journalist. They’re interested, they want to interview your client, and it lines up perfectly with the strategy you built around their goals and objectives.
You send it over, all excited to share what you landed for them, and your client says: “We’re gonna pass.”
So annoying. So frustrating.
And now you get to go back to the editor with nothing, which, let’s be real, isn’t just annoying. It’s really embarrassing.
Then a month later, they pass again. And at the end of the month, they ask you why they aren’t getting any coverage.
Is there anything more annoying? No. Because you’re doing your job and they’re standing in the way.
Here’s what I want you to hear first: it doesn’t mean you’re losing your touch. It’s not that the client hates you. It’s usually a client operating off information that is no longer relevant, or a client who doesn’t fully understand what’s happening in the places they can’t see.
Because clients are trained by what they can see. They see the flashy stuff. They see their competitors popping up in the big outlets they want to be in. What they cannot see is the strategy underneath any of it.
So what they’re really doing is grading your effort against a scorecard nobody ever explained to them.
That’s not a difficult client. That’s a communication gap. And it’s fixable.
I’ve got three reframes for you. What looks like a client problem might actually be a strategy problem. What looks like a communication problem might actually be a contract problem. And what looks like a taste problem might actually be a curation or a math problem.
Let’s go.
Before we call anybody unreasonable or unrealistic, before we point any fingers, ask yourself when you last had a real strategy conversation with this client.
Spoiler alert: for most of us, it was during onboarding. Which was maybe six months ago. Maybe a year ago.
And what’s changed since then? AI discoverability changed which placements matter, and why.
A year ago, a small niche outlet was a nice to have. Some of your more discerning clients probably felt like it wasn’t worth their time (or yours) to land it. But now those smaller niche outlets are a signal to AI.
Here’s the plain language version you can repeat to a client:
Consistent, aligned messaging across relevant sources is what teaches the large language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, all of them) to treat your client as a reliable, credible answer.
Which means a small, targeted outlet with really high domain authority in that niche, on that topic, will read as a stronger signal than a big generic outlet.
And here’s the other piece, the one that should help you get contracts extended: recency carries weight.
That great feature they landed a couple years ago is doing less work for them every single month. It’s getting less current, and AI isn’t weighing it as heavily as it did when it was fresh.
So the small outlet your client is rolling their eyes at is actually doing a job that the big 2023 win has quietly stopped doing.
They’re not being picky. They’re grading you on last year’s scoreboard.
Not a check-in. Not a status update. Not the regular bi-monthly progress call.
Call it an alignment call, because the name sets the frame for what you’re going to discuss and signals that you’re leading the discussion.
Open with this:
“I want to get us back on the same page. Nothing’s wrong. It’s just that the strategy we kicked off this engagement with has evolved since we started. And that’s a great thing, because I want us evaluating the work against a scoreboard that’s current, not one from a year ago.”
Then the reframe:
“I know some of these outlets might look small to you, maybe even inconsequential. Here’s why I’m bringing them to you. When the same message about you, your company, your products, your services, and your expertise shows up consistently across highly relevant sources, that’s what teaches the AI models it’s true and that they can trust it. And recency matters.”
Which means this isn’t a one time thing. It’s not one small outlet, one time, and the models go “got it, on it, we understand.” It’s consistent. Aligned messaging, in features that fit your client’s niche, from sources with high domain authority, over and over.
Then the permission line, and this one lands:
“Let me stick with making you the name that comes up when people search for the thing you’re an expert in. That’s what you hired me for. It’s discoverability, and now that shifts into AI discoverability. That’s my job.”
And to close the loop:
“I never want you sitting there thinking we don’t understand your goals. There’s a strategy underneath every single thing we’re doing in our proactive outreach and every opportunity I send you. I just want to make sure you see it too.”
Deliver all of that as your confident, strategic self. You are the expert. You’re confident, not defensive.
Say it like the expert you are, because you are one.
This is weird client math, and they’re doing it in their heads.
Let’s say your contract lets them decline two opportunities out of ten. Congratulations, you have just taught them that a yes is scarce.
So they hold out. They wait for something better. They pass on a perfectly good opportunity they maybe don’t fully understand, because they’re convinced a better one is coming and they don’t want to waste one of their slots.
The client isn’t trying to be difficult. The client is trying to be strategic with a budget you handed them.
(To be clear, I don’t run our engagements this way. We work on a monthly retainer. There’s no set number of pitches or features, because it genuinely varies month to month depending on whether they have a launch or a promotion running. But I know a lot of agencies do structure it that way.)
And the fix is not removing the clause. That clause might be protecting you. Members of our community put it in there specifically because they don’t want a client continually turning down things they just don’t understand while the team spins its wheels and gets increasingly frustrated. Limiting the number of no’s is protection.
The fix is changing what they think they’re spending.
Here’s what to say:
“You’re not spending anything by saying yes. These opportunities don’t compete with each other. They compound. Three targeted features this quarter do more for you than the one you’re still waiting on.”
Because that’s the truth. When we’re consistently landing features that position you as the expert, or position your brand as the top product in the category, that compounds. AI is continually looking for those signals. When it sees two or three recent ones, that’s the win.
By holding a slot for something better, they’re losing the compounded visibility they’re paying you for.
Every opportunity you source. What you pitched, the response you got, whether the client declined it, and the date.
And track your ideas too, not just the wins. Your partnership pitches. Proactive concepts. Angles you developed.
Give it a professional label. Call it ideation. Put it in the monthly report.
This is a CYA move. (We used to call it that. Cover your ass.) Because I had this conversation, but are they going to remember it? Are we going to be on the same page? Are they going to forget and is it going to come back to bite me in the butt because I didn’t put it in writing?
So now, when a client asks what exactly they’re paying for if they aren’t getting results (while saying no to things), the answer is sitting on a spreadsheet with dates on it.
Here’s what we put together based on your goals and objectives. Here’s the ideation, the strategies and tactics designed to get you there. Here’s what we came up with. And here’s what you didn’t want to pursue.
They’re paying for your expertise, your thinking, and your ideas. Show them the thinking.
It’s not petty. It’s proof.
I am a lawyer. I practiced law 21 years ago. It’s been a while. I’ve been running Jeneration PR for 21 years, but I suppose the lawyer still lives in there somewhere.
The instinct to paper everything and write everything down is maybe one of three things from that world worth keeping. (I fully reject billable hours and tracking your time. I will forever reject that.)
But writing things down, including the ideas you come up with? That’s your work product. You are spending your time thinking about your clients and what they want to achieve and coming up with ideas to get them there. Writing that down is a form of self-protection.
We all think we only get to report results. You can also report ideation, what you tried, and how you’re reworking it if it didn’t land.
This is where you’re setting expectations with a client. It’s also the exact conversation they’ll later say they don’t remember.
Zoom has a million plugins for this, including its own built in recording, and AI will handle the note taking, the transcription, and distill the whole discussion down with timestamps.
You have receipts. So if you ever have to go back to the tape (kindly!), that ends the argument in about nine seconds.
But honestly, that’s not even the best part. That recording and transcript is a jumping off point. You start asking questions that get them talking, and what comes back is pitch angles, hurdles they overcame building the business, personal nuggets and gems that are genuinely newsworthy when you’re pitching them for interviews or telling the founding story.
It can also help you pull quotes. If your founder is hard to reach and you’ve got a shot at getting them quoted in an article on a specific topic, you might already have a couple of usable quotes sitting in that initial recorded discussion.
That’s an asset.
And yes, tell them you’re recording, and tell them why. Not because you want to shove it back in their face when they say “I never agreed to that.” Because you want to lock in the initial ideas and angles that come out of the conversation and grab anything interesting about how the company started.
Ideas are still work product. Report them.
Sometimes you do the alignment call. You get back on the same page. They nod. They get it.
And you still feel kind of awful. Something’s still off. You’re not clicking.
Here’s the pattern. They negotiated your rate down, and then the scope quietly grew. And now you’re working nights and weekends, thinking about them constantly, for less than your entry package.
When a rate gets squeezed but the effort doesn’t, every no from that client costs you double.
That’s where burnout comes from. Not from one bad account. From one that’s underpriced with a scope that doesn’t reflect it.
Look, there are real reasons to discount. You’re just starting out. You want to shift into a new niche. You really want to work with a company because it’ll get you contacts in a space you’re trying to break into, or great results you can turn into a case study that lands you more clients in that niche. Offer the discount. I think that’s a great move.
But put a time limit on it. Three months, six months, then you revisit.
Because when I first started in PR, I was still practicing law. I started representing a beauty brand on the side, unpaid, because I loved the brand and I wanted to help them. And I started getting them great results. Then I decided I wanted to build a business doing this, and they were my first client.
Only catch: they weren’t paying me. I had set up a free relationship with no end date. And it made it almost impossible to have a conversation about actually paying me.
Otherwise you’re pitching for free indefinitely, and you’ll have to backpedal on your own generosity later. Which is not a comfortable conversation. It makes you feel terrible.
Make sure they understand why you’re discounting. You want the case study. You want the testimonial. You want results you can share on social, put in your proposals, put on your website, post on LinkedIn. There’s real value for you in leveraging those wins.
But they have to understand it’s limited. You can’t do that forever.
Is this account draining me, my team, our resources, and our energy more than it’s building?
And is there any version of the next six months where that actually changes?
Here’s the mindset shift. You don’t owe a year of your life to a client who won’t let you do the work. You know this industry. You know how it’s shifting. You know that authority through media is what drives discoverability on AI. If they won’t let you use that expertise to support them in the way they hired you to, you don’t owe them more time.
Most of the time it’s fixable. And it’s fixable with one of those honest conversations on an alignment call that you’ve probably been avoiding.
It’s not comfortable. But once you have it, you feel this huge relief. Like the weight of the world came off your shoulders. (I’m wearing a very fluffy shouldered shirt today, so at the moment it does look like I’m carrying a lot on mine.)
And if it doesn’t get fixed after an honest conversation, then the most professional thing you can do is not extend the contract.
I know that’s harder when it’s one of two clients. Or your only client. That’s real. But it’s not a reason to stay forever. It’s a reason to start filling your pipeline now. This week.
You do not have to keep bending over backwards for a client who’s standing in the way of their own success.
We assume competitor means adversary. It almost never does.
I recently watched an agency owner in a brutal, brutal market start trading opportunities with a direct competitor. And what happened was genuinely cool. That collaboration changed how she felt about being alone in her geographic region and her niche.
Someone she’d viewed as a competitor turned out to be community.
She told us this on a call last week and it was one of the coolest things I’ve heard. They do the exact same thing she does. And they’re sharing opportunities. And it has made her feel so much better in her business.
And then go back to reframe number one.
Maybe you were nodding along at the AI discoverability language. And maybe you were also thinking: okay, but what if the client asks me a follow up question?
Fair. It’s all very new to every single one of us and it evolves constantly. It’s whack-a-mole. We’re all trying to stay on top of it.
So if you’re not totally sure how to get your clients recommended by AI, it’s not because you’re behind. It’s because almost nobody is teaching this to us. Every person explaining it out there is an SEO person or an AI expert. Not a publicist. Not a strategic communications professional. Different job, different instincts, different language than the one we speak as PR pros.
So I made a class about it.
It’s called Strategic Pitching for AI Era Visibility, and it’s about how to get AI models to recommend your clients in 2026 and beyond. It’s information packed, it’s actionable, and it distills everything down in a way that’s easy to digest and easy to understand.
You’ll walk out with two things. First, how to find out exactly why your clients aren’t showing up in AI answer results right now (almost like an audit of where they currently stand). Second, the four step proven plan to fix it.
Which is exactly what lets you have these harder conversations and get your clients on the same page, so they start giving you more yeses. You come in with aligned opportunities, and now they get it. They see it.
The masterclass is totally free and it’s really, really good. I’m giving it live.
Register free at jenerationacademy.com/masterclass. I would love to see you there.
In the meantime, go book that alignment call. Even just putting it on the calendar is going to feel good, knowing you’re tackling this head on.
Otherwise, go out there and crush it this week. I’ll be here crushing it too.
Be the first to comment